Tuesday, October 1, 2013

I like detective stories. And detectives.

In the House of Aryaman was a brilliant detective story. It met all the expectations I had had for Holmes Sherlock, incorporating futuristic technology, genetic engineering, and the like into a complex and incredibly interesting murder mystery (SPOILERS) in which the murder victim was not actually the victim at all, but in fact, the murderer. In building a world where a man (or woman) can change his identity completely--even taking over someone else's identity, and where humans and technology are so tightly integrated, Bear definitely capitalized on the potential of a murder mystery set in a science fiction setting. Did anyone else feel that this story satisfied what was lacking in Holmes Sherlock?

Beautifully interwoven into the investigation was the religious overtones of the impending supernova and the final message sent across time and space. I particularly liked that resolution of the homicide case was overshadowed by something bigger, in every sense of the word--a change in perspective, I suppose. It reminded me of "Exhalation" when the narrator hopes that someone will discover what they left behind long after they've perished. In this case, the signal from across the stars conveyed a message from a civilization that had been obliterated two and a half million years ago.

Side note: apparently 'farang' is the general Thai word for someone of European ancestry, which is sometimes used in a derogatory fashion. It's used a lot in The Windup Girl, and I thought it was just a made up word.

All in all, this was definitely one of my favorite stories.

2 comments:

  1. I definitely feel like it was a much better detective story than Holmes Sherlock. It really was a mystery right up until the end, especially because all of the techno-speak took some unravelling as well. But then again, Holmes Sherlock, though named after the famous detective, wasn't actually about a murder mystery, was it? It was about learning the human condition through literature. Which is, admittedly, less exciting, but still interesting, and not necessarily comparable to "In the House..."

    ReplyDelete
  2. I would argue that "In the House of Aryaman" wasn't ultimately about the murder mystery itself the way that Agatha Christie's novels or other mystery novels are, but rather gaining a greater perspective on existence. (I don't think I worded this quite like I wanted to. It sounded better in my head.)

    ReplyDelete