To me, science fiction
is speculative, often with scientific or technological elements. Many of the
realities presented in science fiction works are worlds that might be or could
have been which differentiates science fiction from fantasy. The fantastic
elements such as futuristic weapons or time machines are explained rationally
through science and technology—concepts which are familiar to us and which we
can observe, which makes science fiction seemingly more plausible than fantasy.
For example, the Doctor’s TARDIS is ‘bigger on the inside’ not because of an
undetectable extension charm as in Harry Potter, but due to Time Lord
technology—the inside is, in fact, another dimension.
Within science fiction
itself, there is much variability. Some science fiction works are commentaries
on governments and societies: dystopias and utopias—for example, Orwell’s 1984, Huxley’s Brave New World, and Lowry’s The
Giver. Others depict intelligent extraterrestrial life (or intelligent life on Earth—mice, who have actually been performing experiments on humans since the world was created—in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy), space travel, galactic
empires, and alternate universes. Within science fiction itself, there is much
variability.
Although I don’t
consider science fiction to be a direct subset of fantasy, they are closely
related. Both genres share quite a few similar elements, the glorification of
youth, quests to vanquish evil and discover strength within, and fantastic
elements that require a suspension of disbelief. What differentiates the two, then,
lies in the plausibility of the universes created. It’s more likely that time
travel is possible, since we have been travelling forward in time since we were
born, than say, that goblins or dwarves or elves exist.
No comments:
Post a Comment