Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Science Fiction

When I think of 'Science Fiction,' I, of course, consider the general consensus that the story somehow revolves around technology or the lack-there-of in a way that, even inaccurately, rationalizes the universe through some form of logic. However, I like to think that there's more to the genre than just those restraints. To me, a Science Fiction story doesn't just highlight the technology available in the fictional world. Rather, it shows the mortality and limitations of the organic world by using synthetic elements to reveal the hubris of man (or other organism) in his quest to transcend the mortal world. For example, in "Tower of Babylon," it is not the technology used to build the tower itself that drives the people to build, but the fact that humanity has grown so arrogant that it thinks man has the right to violate the heavens just because he has the ability to. In the end, the tower these people have devoted their lives to yields no rewards except the knowledge that man cannot actually transcend his own physical world.

1 comment:

  1. Although I agree with much of your post, I disagree with the statement that the tower of babylon yielded no rewards. At the end of the story, Hilallum is not rewarded with more knowledge about Creation, but he is rewarded with the ability to recognize the beauty and artistry of Yaweh's work. Hilallum comes away from his journey with a powerful knowledge of the shape of the world, which to him is a very valuable gift.

    ReplyDelete